Pragmatic Analysis of Impoliteness in the Context of Online Business
Faculty of English Language and Culture, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China
| Abstract: | Impoliteness is an important research issue in pragmatics. The popularity and development of computer-mediated communication (CMC) or internet-mediated communication (IMC) makes the impoliteness phenomena in the online context play an increasingly important role in the pragmatic studies. However, the previous pragmatic studies on impoliteness phenomena mainly focus on traditional issues, and there is still a large room for research on impoliteness phenomena in the context of online business. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the adoption of impoliteness strategies by subjects of commercial activities in the context of online business and its characteristics, in order to provide a new way for the contemporary study of impoliteness phenomena. Using the dialogue between merchants and consumers on the Chinese e-commerce platform Taobao as linguistic data and adopting the qualitative analysis method, this paper analyzes the selection of impoliteness strategies and its characteristics in online business context based on Culpeper and Bousfield’s theories of impoliteness. It was found that the choice of impoliteness strategies in online business contexts is diverse, including direct impoliteness, positive impoliteness (negation of the other party and intentional non-cooperation; insults), negative impoliteness (threats), mock politeness, and interruption/avoidance; in addition, speakers also adopt non-verbal impoliteness strategies, such as repeated use of punctuation marks and emojis, with the former predominating with punctuation marks that express strong emotions, such as exclamation marks. Based on the analysis of linguistic data above, this paper proposes that there emerge three obvious characteristics of impoliteness in online business contexts: the asynchronous nature of time and space exacerbates impoliteness; the virtual nature of tone reinforces impoliteness; and the conversational subjects tend to use multiple impoliteness strategies, including the repeated use of the same impoliteness strategy and the combination of multiple impoliteness strategies. This study sheds new light on the study of impoliteness in online contexts, enriches the study of impoliteness phenomena and further promotes the development of internet pragmatics. |
| Keywords: | Online Business; Impoliteness; Impoliteness Strategy; Pragmatic Characteristics |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2022.01.004 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 24 September 2022
Accepted: 28 October 2022
Published Online: 1 November 2022
Funding
| 1. | 广东外语外贸大学研究生科研创新项目《英汉路径位移构式的认知对比研究》 (22GWCXXM－005) |
References
| [1] | 冉永平等. 语用学十讲 [M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社, 2021. |
| [2] | Locher, M. Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication [J]. Journal of Politeness Research, 2010, (6): 1-5. |
| [3] | 冉永平，宫丽丽 & 杨青. 从“现实世界中的语用学”看研究的前沿态势 [J]. 外语教学与研究, 2018, 50(1): 133-141. |
| [4] | Verschueren, J. Understanding pragmatics [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. |
| [5] | 杨子 & 于国栋. 汉语言语不礼貌的顺应性研究 [J]. 中国外语, 2007, (04): 23-28. |
| [6] | 王传奔. 不礼貌言语行为的顺应性研究 [J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, (01): 64-68. |
| [7] | 赖小玉. 家庭冲突中强势反对的不礼貌研究 [J]. 现代外语, 2014, (01): 42-51+145. |
| [8] | 王地利. 不礼貌言语的积极功能研究 [D]. 湘潭: 湖南科技大学, 2011. |
| [9] | 陈倩 & 冉永平. 有意不礼貌环境下身份构建的和谐-挑战语用取向 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2013, (06): 15-18+28. |
| [10] | 张玮 & 谢朝群. 网络语境下不礼貌语用与身份建构分析——以微博研究为例 [J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, (05): 23-28+34+76. |
| [11] | 张玮 & 谢朝群. 驾校冲突话语中的规约化不礼貌程式与身份建构 [J]. 中国外语, 2016, (06): 45-52. |
| [12] | 周树江. 机构性网络抱怨语中的不礼貌现象分析 [J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2016, (03): 56-60. |
| [13] | 陈倩 & 冉永平. 网络冒犯的人际不礼貌及其负面语用取效[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2019, (06): 48-56+146. |
| [14] | 郑欣蕾. 网络语境的不礼貌语言现象语用分析——以淘宝差评为例 [J]. 海外英语, 2018, (16): 237-238. |
| [15] | Feng, W., & Ren, W. Impoliteness in negative online consumer reviews: A cross-language and cross-sector comparison [J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2020, 17 (1): 1-25. |
| [16] | Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2003, 35 (10-11): 1545-1579. |
| [17] | Culpeper, J. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness [J]. Journal of pragmatics, 1996, 25 (3): 349-367. |
| [18] | Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N.Goody (ed.) Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978: 56-311. |
| [19] | Leech, G. Principals of Pragmatics [M]. London: Longman, 1983. |
| [20] | Bousfield, D. Impoliteness in interaction [M]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 2008. |
| [21] | Lachenicht, L. G. Aggravating language: a study of abusive and insulting language [J]. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 1980, 13 (4): 607-687. |
| [22] | 陶乐心. 网络会话非言语礼貌策略研究 [D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2013. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us