A Comparison of Two Translations of Riverside Town•A Dream of the Night of the 20th Day of the 1st Moon 1075 Under Transitivity Theory
School of Foreign Languages, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
| Abstract: | Transitivity theory is a semantic system under the conceptual function put forward by Halliday, which expresses people’s experience and inner feelings through six processes, namely material process, mental process, relational process, behavioral process, verbal process and existential process. Thus, transitivity theory can provide a new perspective for discourse analysis. Based on the transitivity theory, this paper compares and analyzes two English versions of Riverside Town•A Dream of the Night of the 20th Day of the 1st Moon 1075 English — Xu Yuanchong’s and Burton Waston’s. By comparing the differences and similarities of the process types in each clause chosen by translators, the paper hopes to further help readers understand the main idea and language characteristics of the ancient poetry, and confirms the guiding function of transitivity theory in poetry translation practice. The comparison shows that Xu’s version is more flexible, which not only follows the transitivity process of the original text, but also deeply depicts the poet’s grief for his dead wife. As a foreign translator, Burton tends to take literal translation. But there is no doubt that both translations are excellent. At the same time, the author also believes that transitivity theory is operable in poetry translation. |
| Keywords: | Transitivity Theory; Riverside Town•A Dream of the Night of the 20th Day of the 1st Moon 1075; Translation Comparison |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2022.02.002 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 13 November 2022
Accepted: 4 January 2023
Published Online: 12 January 2023
References
| [1] | Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994. |
| [2] | 胡壮麟, 朱永生, 张德禄. 系统功能语法概论 [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版, 2005: 71-81. |
| [3] | 谷玉英, 何丽. 从及物性角度析《江城子•乙卯正月二十日夜记梦》 [J]. 山东理工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2014, 30 (04): 49-53. |
| [4] | 何曼莉.对苏轼《江城子•十年生死两茫茫》的及物性分析 [J]. 海外英语, 2015 (02): 57-58. 报, 2019, 18 (03): 68-70. |
| [5] | 李凤敏. 《安娜贝尔•李》和《江城子•乙卯正月二十日夜记梦》及物性系统对比分析 [J]. 英语广场, 2015 (08): 56-58. DOI: 10.16723/j.cnki.yygc.2015.08.016. |
| [6] | 杨艳华, 黄桂南. 苏轼《江城子•十年生死》两种英译本的对比研究——以读者接受理论为观照 [J].海外英语, 2016 (20): 126-127. |
| [7] | 胡二娟. 从生态翻译学视角解读苏轼《江城子》英译 [J].漯河职业技术学院学报, 2019, 18 (03): 68-70. |
| [8] | 郭传红, 赵霞. 及物性视角下《山居秋暝》及其英译本的生态话语分析 [J]. 英语广场, 2022, (19): 14-16. |
| [9] | 郭仙河. 从文化语境的角度浅议古诗词翻译 [J].散文百家(新语文活页), 2018 (06): 197-198. |
| [10] | 刘辰. 古诗词英译的翻译变通策略 [J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报(上旬刊), 2020 (08): 221-223. |
| [11] | 姚琦.浅析中国古诗词的翻译美学 [J]. 智富时代, 2019 (03): 160. |
| [12] | 王慧.功能对等翻译视角下的英汉古诗词翻译研究 [J]. 英语广场, 2021 (24): 42-44. DOI: 10.16723.j.cnki.yygc.2021.24.014. |
| [13] | 许芳琼. 归化异化视角下的古诗词翻译探析 [J]. 黑河学院学报, 2019, 10 (12): 163-166. |
| [14] | 周雪. 系统功能语言学的及物性理论 [J]. 现代交际, 2017 (07): 103. |
| [15] | 杨鑫妮. 跨文化阐释视角下许渊冲古诗词翻译的译者主体性研究 [J]. 海外英语, 2021 (24): 75-77. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us