Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Key Laboratory of Rheumatic Disease and Translational Medicine, Jinan 250000, China
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of a novel internal fixation device for femoral neck fractures with those of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) system, and to evaluate its mechanical performance under experimental conditions. Methods A standardized femoral neck fracture model was established using SAWBONES femoral specimens. The novel internal fixation device (experimental group) and the DHS system (control group) were implanted separately, with five specimens in each group. Static compression tests were performed to determine the overall stiffness, yield load, and yield displacement of the fixation constructs. Compression fatigue tests using a stepwise loading protocol were conducted to evaluate fatigue endurance by recording the number of cycles to failure at different load levels. Finite element models were established under identical geometric and material assumptions, and stress and displacement distributions were analyzed using ANSYS 15.0 software. Results In the static compression test, the experimental group demonstrated a stiffness of 5040.1 ± 55.86 N/mm, a yield load of 4369.7 ± 52.53 N, and a yield displacement of 1.12 ± 0.01 mm, while the corresponding values in the control group were 4967.6 ± 155.07 N/mm, 4161.9 ± 96.20 N, and 1.11 ± 0.01 mm, respectively. The static mechanical performance of the two groups was generally comparable. In the compression fatigue test, both fixation systems successfully completed 1,000,000 loading cycles under a minimum load of 220 N and a maximum load of 2200 N without failure, indicating similar fatigue endurance. Finite element analysis showed comparable patterns of stress concentration and displacement distribution between the two fixation constructs. Conclusion The novel internal fixation device for femoral neck fractures demonstrated biomechanical performance comparable to that of the DHS system in terms of static strength, fatigue endurance, and finite element mechanical response, providing mechanical evidence for further experimental and clinical investigations. |
| Keywords: | Femoral Neck Fracture; Internal Fixation; Biomechanics; Finite Element Analysis; Fatigue Test |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cmf.2026.03.001 |
| [1] | LIU P, ZHANG Y, SUN B, et al. Risk factors for femoral neck fracture in elderly population [J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2021, 46(3): 272-277. https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190378 |
| [2] | ZHANG C, FENG J, WANG S, et al. Incidence of and trends in hip fracture among adults in urban China: A nationwide retrospective cohort study [J]. PLoS Medicine, 2020, 17(8): e1003180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003180 |
| [3] | XIA W, ZHANG A, QIU B, et al. Femoral neck fracture after femoral head necrosis: A case report and review of the literature [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2023, 24(1): 853. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06992-9 |
| [4] | ZHOU Y, ZHANG Y, LU P, et al. An overview on the treatment strategies of non-displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly [J]. Arthroplasty, 2022, 4(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00111-0 |
| [5] | SIAVASHI B, AALIREZAEI A, MOOSAVI M, et al. A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39(10): 2069-2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9 |
| [6] | RAMADANOV N, JÓŹWIAK K, HAUPTMANN M, et al. Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2023, 18(1): 625. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8 |
| [7] | ELGEIDI A, EL NEGERY A, ABDELLATIF M S, et al. Dynamic hip screw and fibular strut graft for fixation of fresh femoral neck fracture with posterior comminution [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137(10): 1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2758-z |
| [8] | GAO Z, WANG M, SHEN B, et al. Treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with medial femoral neck support screw: A biomechanical and clinical study [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 21418. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01010-1 |
| [9] | CUI H, WEI W, SHAO Y, et al. Finite element analysis of fixation effect for femoral neck fracture under different fixation configurations [J]. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 25(2): 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1935899 |
| [10] | ZHU J, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Clinical outcome and biomechanical analysis of dynamic hip screw combined with derotation screw in treating displaced femoral neck fractures based on different reduction qualities in young patients (≤65 years of age) [J]. BioMed Research International, 2022, 2022: 9505667. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9505667 |
| [11] | HONG H, SHA M, CHEN Z, et al. Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of Garden II-IV type femoral neck fractures [J]. Technology and Health Care, 2024, 32(6): 4009-4017. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-231547 |
| [12] | DABIS J, ABDUL-JABAR H B, DABIS H. Implant failure in a proximal femoral fracture treated with dynamic hip screw fixation [J]. Journal of Surgical Case Reports, 2015, 2015(7): rjv064. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjv064 |
| [13] | JIANG X, LIANG K, DU G, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different internal fixation methods based on finite element analysis for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture [J]. Injury, 2022, 53(10): 3115-3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.038 |
| [14] | RUSSELL R D, HUO M H, RODRIGUES D C, et al. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study [J]. Technology and Health Care, 2016, 24(6): 865-872. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-161235 |
| [15] | SUN X, LU Y, HUANG Y, et al. Finite element analysis of six internal fixations in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture [J]. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(6): 1514-1525. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14069 |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us