School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China
| Abstract: | Instruction is the behaviour with purposes and reasons. The objectives in instruction are the expectations of learners’ learning results, which expresses the purposes. When the objectives, teaching activities and assessment in instruction are designed based on learning outcomes, educators are able to prove by this assessment that what they educate is exactly what learners should learn, which expresses the reasons. Being aimed at the contradiction between more teaching contents and less class hours in specialized courses at present, in this article are researched the method of designing teaching activities on the premise of ensuring instruction quality, and the method of assessing learners’ learning outcomes which is able to reflect instruction effectiveness. Within the framework of objectives taxonomy constructed by the two attributes of knowledge and cognitive processes, taking the course of Power System Analysis in polytechnic universities as an example, in this article an instructional design which reflects the purposes and reasons of instruction is presented in the form of instruction cases, and the rationality of the design of the objectives, teaching activities and assessment is analyzed, researched and improved, and also is the consistency between the three of them. This instructional design has been applied to the undergraduate instruction in the specialized subject of electrical engineering and automation at Liaoning Technical University, from which hundreds of students in multiple grades are benefited. These instructing practices illustrate that with its application the engagement and activity of students in class activities are all improved significantly, such negative situations as the scope delineation by pestering educators and the cramming of students for final examinations are reduced. And also, the improvement of instruction quality is accordingly promoted to some extent. Consequently, the outcome-oriented instructive design within the framework of objectives taxonomy has been proved to be scientific and innovative, and it can be highly spread and applied to other educational practices. |
| Keywords: | The Framework of Taxonomy; Outcome-based Education; Instructional Design; Objectives; Teaching Activities; Assessment |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.edu.2022.02.005 |
| [1] | L. W. 安德森等编著. 皮连生主译. 学习、教学和评估的分类学——布卢姆教育目标分类学修订版[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2007. 11. 3-9, 25-94 |
| [2] | 陈珩编. 电力系统稳态分析 [M]. -4版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2015. 10. 1-3, 12 |
| [3] | 李光琦编. 电力系统暂态分析 [M]. -3版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2007. 1-2 |
| [4] | 夏道止主编. 电力系统分析 [M]. -2版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2010. 12. 170 |
| [5] | 韩祯祥主编. 电力系统分析 [M]. -5版. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2013.1 (2015.1重印). 6-7. |
| [6] | (美) 泰勒 (Tyler, R. W.) 著; 罗康, 张阅译. 课程与教学的基本原理 [M]: 汉英双语版. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2014.1 (2021.3重印). 1-5, 135 |
| [7] | P. L. 史密斯, T. J. 雷根著, 庞维国等译. 教学设计 [M]: 第三版. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2008. 4-7, 10-18 |
| [8] | 本报评论员. 课堂改革是推进教育公平的最后一公里 [N]. 中国教师报, 2019-04-24 (001). |
| [9] | 杜悦. 课程改革如何跨越深水区 [N]. 中国教育报, 2013-11-20 (009). |
| [10] | 李林霞. 一所高校的“金课”改革实践 [N]. 山西日报, 2019-05-09 (010). |
| [11] | 符晓波. “非常规课程”是大学课程改革的有益尝试 [N]. 科技日报, 2021-10-22 (002). DOI: 10.28502/n.cnki.nkjrb.2021.005726. |
| [12] | 李红, 杨剑锋, 闵永智. 一流本科专业建设背景下远程监控技术课程教学改革与实践 [J]. 中国现代教育装备, 2022 (21): 132-136. DOI:10.13492/j.cnki.cmee.2022.21.053. |
| [13] | 李莎莎, 赵辉, 李兴华. 一流本科课程建设视角下“高等数学”课程建设的研究与实践——以哈尔滨理工大学为例 [J]. 黑龙江教育(理论与实践), 2022 (12): 61-63. |
| [14] | (美) W. 迪克等著; 庞维国译. 系统化教学设计 [M]: 第六版. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2007. 6. 1-6, 15-34. |
| [15] | (美) 加涅等著; 王小明等译. 教学设计原理 [M]: 第五版. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2018. 6. 1-6, 46-58, 61-81 |
| [16] | 雨课堂 - 免费的智慧教学解决方案 [OL], https://www.yuketang.cn/. |
| [17] | 葛群, 张强. 产出导向课程建设目标与评价系统的设计与开发 [C]. 第7届2021年全国高等学校电气类专业教学改革研讨会, 会议论文集三: 课程建设. 2021年7月, 湖南长沙. 73-78. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us