A Contrastive Study of Chinese and American Almanacs: From the Perspective of Contrastive Linguistics and Systemic-functional Linguistics
School of English Studies, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China
| Abstract: | An almanac is a book published annually giving statistical information on various subjects. Underpinned by the theories of CL and SFL, this study adopts both qualitative and quantitative analysis with a contrastive approach to full or sample texts, on the level of lexicogrammar, three metafunctions and genre stratum respectively, to see to what extent Chinese and American local comprehensive almanacs are similar or different in dealing with equivalent information through the same genre. Based upon the empirical data we have collected of local materials and copies of American almanacs, it is found that the genre of almanac, as a kind of reference book, conditions the ideational metafunction in fundamental objectivity, the interpersonal metafunction in objectivity and straightness, and certain lexicogrammatical features in objectivity, detachment, result-orientation, economy and accuracy. Combining the three lines of inquiry, we can see that genre is positioned as an abstract level of analysis coordinating field, tenor and mode (known collectively as register), and register is realized in turn through language (discourse semantics, lexicogrammar, etc). Both show the linguistic features of almanac as detached, result-oriented, economical and accurate. However, due to the linguistic conventions, social and cultural differences, Chinese and American almanacs have rather observable distinctions in generic structure. It is believed that the present study can bridge the gap between linguistics and almanacs, and pave a new way for the development of both CL and SFL, and almanac studies. |
| Keywords: | Almanac; Contrastive Analysis; Systemic-Functional Linguistics; Genre |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ha.2022.01.005 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 12 September 2022
Accepted: 11 October 2022
Published Online: 27 October 2022
References
| [1] | Alvarez, E. C. Texas Almanac 2014-2015 [M]. Denton: Texas State Historical Association, 2014. |
| [2] | Marth, D. & Marth, M. J. Florida Almanac 2002-2003 [M]. Gretna: Pelican Publishing Company, Inc., 2002. |
| [3] | Compilation Committee of Shanghai Almanac. Shanghai Almanac 2013 [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Almanac Editorial Office. 2013. |
| [4] | Compilation Committee of Shanghai Almanac. Shanghai Almanac 2011 [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Almanac Editorial Office. 2011. |
| [5] | Compilation Committee of Minhang local chronicles. Shanghai Minhang Almanac 2013 [M]. Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House. 2013. |
| [6] | Compilation Committee of Minhang local chronicles. Shanghai Minhang Almanac 2011 [M]. Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House. 2011. |
| [7] | Xiao, D. F. et al. An Introduction to Almanac Studies [M]. Beijing: China Book Publishing House. 1991. |
| [8] | Xiao, D. F. & Shao, R. X. A Practical Guide to Almanac Studies [M]. Beijing: China Literature Publishing House. 2000. |
| [9] | Martin, J. R. Genre Studies [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press. 2012. |
| [10] | Lü, X. L. Planning Shanghai Almanac (English version) [J]. Shanghai local Chronicles 2014 (6): 20-25. |
| [11] | Zhang, Z. B. A New English Grammar Coursebook [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 1995. |
| [12] | Lü, S. X. An Outline of Chinese Grammar [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press. 1982. |
| [13] | Wang, L. Modern Chinese Grammar [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press. 2011. |
| [14] | Zhang, G. B. Relative Degree Adverbials and Absolute Degree Adverbials [J]. Journal of East China Normal University ( Philosophy and Social Sciences). 1997 (2): 92-96. |
| [15] | Yang, R. X. Functional Differences of Scope Adverbs—and the Classification of the subcaterogy of Adverbs [J]. Journal of Hubei University ( Philosophy and Social Sciences). 2000 (4): 53-57. |
| [16] | Li, X. J. The Referent Meaning of gai and its Generalization [J]. Studies of The Chinese Language. 2008 (1): 40-46. |
| [17] | Halliday, M. A. K. & R. Hasan. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman Group Ltd., 1976. |
| [18] | Jespersen, O. Essentials of English Grammar [M]. London: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. |
| [19] | Li, Z. L. A Contrastive Study of the Grammaticalization of Chinese and English Time Marking System [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press. 2010. |
| [20] | Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third Edition) [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2008. |
| [21] | Xu, Y. L. Contrastive Linguistics [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 2010. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us