Department of Landscape Planning and Design, School of Art Design and Media, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
| Abstract: | The relationship between Chenghuang Temple and affiliated Garden is a representative urban historical public space in Shanghai, which is more typical in Qingpu. A large number of Chenghuang Temple and affiliated gardens were built in Qingpu during the Ming and Qing dynasties, of which two Chenghuang Temple and affiliated gardens in Qingpu County and Zhujiajiao Town are the most famous. The construction process of temples and gardens in both regions has gone through twists and turns, and there are many similarities: from the beginning of construction in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, to the destruction caused by war during the Xiantong period, as well as the reconstruction during the Guangxu period, and the new development in contemporary times. With the social change and the development of the times, the space and landscape of the Chenghuang Temple and affiliated garden in the two places have changed one after another, the relationship between affiliated garden has also changed, and the interactive relationship with the urban space has also been reconstructed. This paper focuses on the development of temples and gardens in Qingpu County and Zhujiajiao Town after the Ming Dynasty, and conducts a comparative study of the two from the aspects of historical changes, temple patterns, garden layout and the relationship between temples and gardens. By analyzing the diachronic changes of the landscape space and social functions of temples and gardens, it reveals the transformation of the relationship between temples and gardens with social change, and the construction process of the interactive relationship between urban historical public space and cities such as Chenghuang Temple and affiliated Garden. |
| Keywords: | Qingpu; Zhujiajiao; Chenghuang Temple; Affiliated Garden; Publicity |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ha.2023.02.001 |
| 1. | 国家社会科学基金中华学术外译项目 “江南园林论” (编号 17WYS003) |
| 2. | 上海市浦江人才计划项目“式与度: 江南传统园林弹性景观控制方法及当代应用研究” (编号 2020PJC021) |
| [1] | 张传勇. 明清祭厉与城隍行宫的建置 [J]. 历史教学 (下半月刊), 2020, No. 853 (12): 16-23. |
| [2] | 滨岛敦俊. 明清江南农村社会与民间信仰 [M]. 朱海滨, 译. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2008. |
| [3] | (清) 诸联纂《明斋小识》, 嘉庆十八年刻本. |
| [4] | (清) 王昶等纂《青浦县志》, 乾隆四十六年修. |
| [5] | (清) 周郁滨等纂《珠里小志》, 嘉庆二十年修. |
| [6] | (清) 汪祖绶等修, 熊其英等纂《青浦县志》, 光绪五年修. |
| [7] | 张仁静修, 钱崇威纂、金咏榴续纂的《青浦县续志》, 1934年修. |
| [8] | 滨岛敦俊, 许檀. 明初城隍考 [J]. 社会科学家, 1991 (06): 22-30+21. |
| [9] | 郑士有, 王贤淼. 中国城隍信仰 [M]. 上海: 上海三联书店, 1994. |
| [10] | 刘茜. 上海地区城隍庙建筑及相关研究 [D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2003. |
| [11] | 王健. 官民共享空间的形成: 明清江南的城隍庙与城市社会 [J]. 史学月刊, 2011 (07): 57-66. |
| [12] | 朱宇晖. 上海传统园林研究 [D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2003. |
| [13] | 胡石. 明清城市庙市 [D]. 江苏: 东南大学, 2000. |
| [14] | 王隽. 上海庙园场景转换与空间变迁研究 [D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us