School of Civil Engineering Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| Abstract: | The integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for early-stage building design is often limited by inconsistent material naming, manual classification, and time-consuming carbon calculations. Existing BIM-LCA approaches typically focus on structural components such as concrete and steel, while non-structural elements including partitions, finishes, and insulation remain underexplored despite their potential contribution to total embodied carbon. This study presents a semi-automated BIM-LCA workflow for whole-building embodied carbon assessment during cradle-to-gate (A1–A3) stages, developed in accordance with EN 15978:2011 and ISO 14040:2006. The workflow integrates automated material name cleaning, keyword-based classification with priority logic, and embedded density and emission factor assignment within a unified Excel-based framework using Visual Basic for Applications (VBA). A five-story office building modelled in Autodesk Revit at Level of Development (LOD) 300 serves as the case study, with material quantities extracted from the BIM model and processed through the VBA-based classification system; density values were obtained from the Engineering ToolBox and emission factors from the ICE Database Version 3.0. The workflow reduces manual processing time from 74.8 minutes to 4.5 minutes (94% reduction) through rule-based material classification and automated emission factor assignment. Results indicate that metal-related materials contribute 82% of total embodied carbon, with metal stud framing alone accounting for 81.6% due to its extensive use in partition walls across all five floors. Pareto analysis further confirms this concentration, with the top five materials responsible for over 94% of total embodied carbon, demonstrating that a small number of materials can dominate a building's embodied carbon profile. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for non-structural elements, frequently overlooked in conventional BIM-LCA assessments. The proposed method enables early-stage low-carbon design decisions without requiring specialized LCA expertise, offering a transparent, non-proprietary alternative to commercial BIM-LCA tools adaptable to different building typologies through modification of the keyword-based classification system. |
| Keywords: | Building Information Modelling (BIM); Early-Stage Design; Embodied Carbon; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Level of Development (LOD) 300; Pareto Analysis |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.jsts.2026.02.001 |
| [1] | IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926 |
| [2] | Fnais, A., Rezgui, Y., Petri, I., Beach, T., Yeung, J., Ghoroghi, A., & Kubicki, S. The application of life cycle assessment in buildings: challenges, and directions for future research. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27(5), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02058-5 |
| [3] | RICS. Whole Life Carbon Assessment for the Built Environment (2nd ed.). Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London, UK, 2023. Available from: https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/construction-standards/whole-life-carbon-assessment |
| [4] | Ingrao, C., Messineo, A., Beltramo, R., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 201, 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.080 |
| [5] | Kiemel, S., Rietdorf, C., Schutzbach, M., & Miehe, R. How to simplify life cycle assessment for industrial applications — a comprehensive review. Sustainability, 2022, 14(23), 15704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315704 |
| [6] | Onososen, A., Musonda, I., & Tjebane, M. M. Drivers of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment of buildings: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Sustainability, 2022, 14(17), 11052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711052 |
| [7] | Lima, M. S. S., Duarte, S., Exenberger, H., Fröch, G., & Flora, M. Integrating BIM-LCA to enhance sustainability assessments of constructions. Sustainability, 2024, 16(3), 1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031172 |
| [8] | Zimmermann, R. K., Bruhn, S., & Birgisdóttir, H. BIM-based life cycle assessment of buildings — an investigation of industry practice and needs. Sustainability, 2021, 13(10), 5455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105455 |
| [9] | Parece, S., Resende, R., & Rato, V. BIM-based life cycle assessment: a systematic review on automation and decision-making during design. Building and Environment, 2025, 282, 113248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113248 |
| [10] | Choi, J., Kim, H., & Kim, I. Open BIM-based quantity take-off system for schematic estimation of building frame in early design stage. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2014, 2(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2014.11.002 |
| [11] | Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) Version 3.0. Circular Ecology, Bath, UK, 2019. Available from: https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprint-database.html |
| [12] | Dalla Mora, T., Bolzonello, E., Cavalliere, C., & Peron, F. Key parameters featuring BIM-LCA integration in buildings: a practical review of the current trends. Sustainability, 2020, 12(17), 7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177182 |
| [13] | Parece, S., Resende, R., & Rato, V. A BIM-based tool for embodied carbon assessment using a construction classification system. Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, 19, 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100467 |
| [14] | Yang, A., Han, M., Zeng, Q., & Sun, Y. Adopting building information modeling (BIM) for the development of smart buildings: a review of enabling applications and challenges. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811476 |
| [15] | Guignone, G., Calmon, J. L., Vieira, D., & Bravo, A. BIM and LCA integration methodologies: a critical analysis and proposed guidelines. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 73, 106780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106780 |
| [16] | CEN. EN 15978:2011 Sustainability of Construction Works — Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings — Calculation Method. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2011. Available from: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-15978-2011-sustainability-of-construction-works-assessment-of-environmental-performance-of-buildings-calculation-method/ |
| [17] | EN ISO 14040:2006. Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Framework. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html |
| [18] | Engineering ToolBox. Densities of Common Materials. 2008. Available from: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/density-materials-d_1652.html |
| [19] | Hollberg, A., Genova, G., & Habert, G. Evaluation of BIM-based LCA results for building design. Automation in Construction, 2020, 109, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102972 |
| [20] | Arenas, N. F., & Shafique, M. Reducing embodied carbon emissions of buildings — a key consideration to meet the net zero target. Sustainable Futures, 2024, 7, 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100166 |
| [21] | Li, Q., Yang, W., Kohler, N., Yang, L., Li, J., Sun, Z., Yu, H., Liu, L., & Ren, J. A BIM–LCA approach for the whole design process of green buildings in the Chinese context. Sustainability, 2023, 15(4), 3629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043629 |
| [22] | Myint, N. N., & Shafique, M. Embodied carbon emissions of buildings: taking a step towards net zero buildings. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20, e03024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03024 |
| [23] | Altaf, M., Jaffari, R., Alalaoul, W. S., Musarat, M. A., & Ammad, S. Developing automated strategy of life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) with building information modeling (BIM) integration for building projects. Results in Engineering, 2025, 25, 104179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104179 |
| [24] | Dervishaj, A., Malmqvist, T., Silfwerbrand, J., & Gudmundsson, K. A digital workflow for assessing lifespan, carbonation, and embodied carbon of reusing concrete in buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 96, 110536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110536 |
| [25] | Parece, S., Resende, R., & Rato, V. Stakeholder perspectives on BIM-LCA integration in building design: adoption, challenges, and future directions. Building and Environment, 2025, 284, 113434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113434 |
| [26] | Alwan, Z., & Ilhan Jones, B. IFC-based embodied carbon benchmarking for early design analysis. Automation in Construction, 2022, 142, 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104505 |
| [27] | Fonseca Arenas, N., & Shafique, M. Recent progress on BIM-based sustainable buildings: state of the art review. Developments in the Built Environment, 2023, 15, 100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100176 |
| [28] | Cepa, J. J., Pavón, R. M., Alberti, M. G., Ciccone, A., & Asprone, D. A review on the implementation of the BIM methodology in the operation maintenance and transport infrastructure. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(5), 3176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053176 |
| [29] | Chen, Z., Chen, L., Zhou, X., Huang, L., Sandanayake, M., & Yap, P.-S. Recent technological advancements in BIM and LCA integration for sustainable construction: a review. Sustainability, 2024, 16(3), 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031340 |
| [30] | Ferreira, M. T. H. A., Aguiar Costa, A., & Silvestre, J. D. Integrating life cycle assessment and building information modelling: a purpose-driven approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 2026, 118, 115006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.115006 |
| [31] | Klumbyte, E., Georgali, P.-Z., Spudys, P., Giama, E., Morkunaite, L., Pupeikis, D., Jurelionis, A., & Fokaides, P. Enhancing whole building life cycle assessment through building information modelling: principles and best practices. Energy and Buildings, 2023, 296, 113401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113401 |
| [32] | Kylili, A., Fokaides, P. A., Vaiciunas, J., & Seduikyte, L. Integration of building information modelling (BIM) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for sustainable constructions. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2016, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.13.4.12862 |
| [33] | Nasir, M. J. M., Prakash, P. R., & Suman, M. An automated BIM-GRIHA15-LCA framework for building sustainability assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 101, 111908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111908 |
| [34] | Nurzhan, A., Ruan, X., & Chen, D. A review of life cycle assessment application in municipal waste management: recent advances, limitations, and solutions. Sustainability, 2025, 17(1), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010302 |
| [35] | Potrč Obrecht, T., Röck, M., Hoxha, E., & Passer, A. BIM and LCA integration: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14), 5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534 |
| [36] | Soust-Verdaguer, B., Gutiérrez Moreno, J. A., & Llatas, C. Utilization of an automatic tool for building material selection by integrating life cycle sustainability assessment in the early design stages in BIM. Sustainability, 2023, 15(3), 2274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032274 |
| [37] | Theißen, S., Höper, J., Drzymalla, J., Wimmer, R., Markova, S., Meins-Becker, A., & Lambertz, M. Using open BIM and IFC to enable a comprehensive consideration of building services within a whole-building LCA. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14), 5644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145644 |
| [38] | Xue, K., Hossain, Md. U., Liu, M., Ma, M., Zhang, Y., Hu, M., Chen, X., & Cao, G. BIM integrated LCA for promoting circular economy towards sustainable construction: an analytical review. Sustainability, 2021, 13(3), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031310 |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us