1. College of Airport, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou 256600, China
2. College of Science, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou 256600, China
| Abstract: | In aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) systems, spare parts inventory management faces highly stochastic demand, significant tail risks, supply delays, and complex contractual constraints, making it difficult for traditional deterministic or risk-neutral models to balance high service levels with low costs. This paper proposes a multi-stage stochastic programming inventory optimization model incorporating Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to enhance economic efficiency and robustness. The model employs a scenario generation framework based on moment matching and entropically regularized optimal transport that preserves inter-part correlations through Pearson coefficients and efficiently reduces scenario trees via Sinkhorn distance, accurately capturing demand volatility and extreme tail events. It further incorporates non-anticipativity constraints in a multi-stage mixed-integer stochastic program, along with rolling-horizon mechanisms, tiered pricing, and contract restrictions to enable dynamic ordering decisions under sequentially revealed information. A Mean-CVaR optimization criterion with a tunable risk aversion parameter is introduced to balance expected cost against extreme losses. Numerical experiments on typical spare parts from a commercial airline’s B737 fleet show that the risk-averse model modestly increases expected cost relative to the risk-neutral version but substantially reduces tail risk. Stochastic strategies outperform deterministic approaches, with value-of-stochastic-solution metrics confirming clear advantages under uncertainty, while model stability and robustness are validated through in-sample and out-of-sample testing. This study offers airlines a practical framework for developing cost-effective and safe spare parts inventory policies in uncertain environments. |
| Keywords: | Multi-stage Stochastic Programming; CVaR; Aviation Spare Parts Inventory; Moment Matching |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.se.2026.02.001 |
| [1] | Harris F W. How Many Parts to Make at Once [J]. Operations Research, 1990, 38(6): 947–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.6.947 |
| [2] | Dye C Y, Ouyang L Y, Hsieh T P. Deterministic inventory model for deteriorating items with capacity constraint and time-proportional backlogging rate [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 178(3): 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.024 |
| [3] | Liao J J, Chung K J, Huang K N. A deterministic inventory model for deteriorating items with two warehouses and trade credit in a supply chain system [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(2): 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.001 |
| [4] | Pashapour A, Bidaki F Z. Approximate Dynamic Programming for a Remanufacture-to-Order System [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02656, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.02656 |
| [5] | Reddy K N, Kumar A. Capacity investment and inventory planning for a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system in the circular economy [J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(8): 2450–2478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1734681 |
| [6] | Taleizadeh A A, Niaki S T A, Seyedjavadi S M H. Multi-product multi-chance-constraint stochastic inventory control problem with dynamic demand and partial back-ordering: A harmony search algorithm [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2012, 31(2): 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.05.006 |
| [7] | Agrawal V, Seshadri S. Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4): 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2.4.410.12339 |
| [8] | Chen F, Federgruen A. Mean-variance analysis of basic inventory models [R]. Working paper, Columbia University, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(81)90069-4 |
| [9] | Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk [J]. Journal of Risk, 2000, 2: 21–42. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2000.038 |
| [10] | Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2002, 26(7): 1443–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00271-6 |
| [11] | Chan F T S, Xu X. The loss-averse retailer’s order decisions under risk management [J]. Mathematics, 2019, 7(7): 595. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7070595 |
| [12] | Xu X, Ji P, Sang S. Supply option purchasing decisions via mismatch cost minimization [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2023, 210: 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2023.03.021 |
| [13] | Hu S L, Han C F, Meng L P. Stochastic optimization for joint decision making of inventory and procurement in humanitarian relief [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 111: 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.029 |
| [14] | Philpott A B, De Matos V L. Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(2): 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.056 |
| [15] | Noyan N. Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2012, 39(3): 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2011.03.017 |
| [16] | Heitsch H, Römisch W. Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming [J]. Computational optimization and applications, 2003, 24(3): 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021805924152 |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us