School of Teacher Education, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou 313000, China
| Abstract: | SNARC effect is called the joint effect of spatial digital response coding, which is the proof of the connection between number and space. There are mainly theoretical explanations, such as the mental number line explanation of long-term memory, the working memory explanation of short-term memory, and the dual path pattern explanation. Recent studies have demonstrated that SNARC effect is the online construction of digits in working memory during task execution, and the online construction of digits SNARC effect is interfered by letter processing in the mixed situation of digits and letters, which further supports the hypothesis of working memory. Although online encoding of SNARC effect has been proved, it is not clear whether online encoding of digital spatial representation in the mixed alphanumeric context has automaticity, and if so, whether it will be interfered by letter processing. In this study, three digit color judgment experiments were conducted, and the ratio of digits to letters was 1:1. 1:6. The paper explores whether the online construction of digital space representation is automaticity in the mixed interference situation of 6:1. To investigate the interference of letter processing on digital SNARC effect, explore whether the interference is regulated by the proportion of number letters, and further explore the automatic mechanism of the interference of letter processing on digital space coding. The results showed that SNARC effect was not observed in the mixed numbers and letters at different proportions. It shows that the online construction of digital space representation in the mixed alphanumeric situation does not have automaticity. When the task does not directly activate the size order information of the number letters, the letters will interfere with the online construction of the number SNARC effect, which is not proportional adjustment. |
| Keywords: | SNARC Effect; Numbers; Letters; Automaticity |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2022.02.004 |
| [1] | Frick A. Spatial transformation abilities and their relation to later mathematics performance [J]. Psychological Research. 2019, 83 (7): 1465-1484. |
| [2] | 徐晓东, 刘昌. 数字的空间特性 [J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14 (6): 851-858. |
| [3] | Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1229–1241. |
| [4] | Georges, C., Hoffmann, D., & Schiltz, C. (2017). Mathematical abilities in elementary school: Do they relate to number–space associations? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 126–147. |
| [5] | He, Y., Nuerk, H. C., Derksen, A., Shi, J., Zhou, X., & Cipora, K. (2020). A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls. Psychological Research. |
| [6] | 赵平. 儿童数字空间表征发展及其与数学学业能力的关系研究 [D]. 河北师范大学, 2015. |
| [7] | Phair R. International early learning and child well-being study assessment framework [J]. directorate for Education ardskills, 2021 (3). |
| [8] | Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude [J]. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1993, 122 (3): 371-396. |
| [9] | Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W. The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized [J]. Cognition, 2003, 87 (3): B87-B95. |
| [10] | Prpic, V., Fumarola, A., De Tommaso, M., Luccio, R., Murgia, M., & Agostini, T. (2016). Separate mechanisms for magnitude and order processing in the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect: The strange case of musical note values. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42 (8), 1241–1251. |
| [11] | He, D. X., He, X. Y., Zhao, T. T., Wang, J., Li, L. Z., & Louwerse, M. (2020). Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 680. |
| [12] | Nuerk H-C, Weger, Willmes U, et al. Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 2001, 82 (1): 25-33. |
| [13] | 戴隆农, 潘运. 数字-空间联结的内在机制: 基于工作记忆的视角 [J]. 心理科学, 2021 (4): 793-799. |
| [14] | 颜丽珠, 陈妍秀, 刘勋,等. 数字空间联结的灵活性及其内在机制 [J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30 (1): 51-64. |
| [15] | 潘运, 戴隆农, 赵竹君, 等. 正负数混合呈现对负数 SNARC 效应的影响 [J]. 心理科学, 2019, 42 (5): 1083-1090. |
| [16] | 王强强,张琦,石文典,等.数字空间表征的在线建构:来自干扰情境中数字SNARC效应的证据 [J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (07): 761-771. |
| [17] | 王强强, 安宝霞, 吴彦文, 兰继军. 不同类型材料混合呈现对 SNARC 效应的影响[J]. 应用心理学, 2016, 22 (4): 352-363. |
| [18] | Fischer M H, Shaki S. Spatial associations in numerical cognition—From single digits to arithmetic [J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2014, 67 (8): 1461-1483. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us