School of Arts and Sciences, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology,, Xi’an 710021, China
| Abstract: | Genre analysis study in the past focused on abstract or introduction of research articles, less attention has been paid to the prefaces to monographs, and linguistic monographs in particular. In addition, previous research on genre analysis study revolved around the structure itself, ignoring the linguistic realization of the structure. Based on an analytical framework and self-constructed corpus consisting of Chinese Linguistics Monographs, the present study tries both to generalize the generic structure of the less-heeded preface of linguistic monographs and to explore the linguistic resources with which the structure is realized. Genre analysis of these prefaces indicated that: there are four moves in prefaces: Move 1 (Introducing the Research), Move 2 (Introducing the Book), Move 3 (Expressing Gratitude) and Move 4 (Self-gradating and Soliciting a Response), among which Moves 1, 2, and 4 are obligatory while Move 3 is not. Analysis of linguistic resources that realize generic structures showed that: among the four processes analyzed, relational process, material process, and mental process occur more frequently in “Introducing the Field”, while material process, verbal process and relational process are relatively frequent in “Introducing the Book”; The use of personal pronouns in Moves 1 and 3 are more frequent than in Move 2; Modal verbs occur more frequently in Moves 1 and 2 but less so in Moves 3 and 4, conjunction occurs more frequently in Moves 4 and 3 than in Moves 1 and 2. |
| Keywords: | Moves, Steps, Metafunctions, Prefaces, Chinese Linguistics Monographs |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2023.05.001 |
| [1] | Pearsall, P. 2001/1998. The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1461. |
| [2] | Bhatia, V. K. 1997. Genre-Mixing in Academic Introductions. English for Specific Purposes (3): 181-195. |
| [3] | Luzón & Maria. J. 1994. An Interactive Genre within the University Textbook: the preface. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication (4): 409-429. |
| [4] | Feng Wenhe. 2000. A Comparison and Analysis of Prefaces in the Chinese and Western Book. Journal of Xidian University (Social Sciences Edition) (1): 90-93. |
| [5] | Li Jian. 2005. A Study of Generic Structure of Prefaces in Eight Textbook (Unpublished MA Thesis). Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University. |
| [6] | Yang Linxiu. 2007. A Contrastive Study on Generic Structure of Prefaces of English and Chinese Monographs. Journal of Gansu Lianhe University (Social Sciences Edition) (3): 88-92. |
| [7] | Zhou Jiaping. 2014. A Contrastive Study of Macroscopic Semantic structure in English and Chinese Prefaces, Journal of Hebei North University (Social Sciences Edition) (3): 12-14. |
| [8] | Qian Yifei. 2016. A Study on Generic Potentials of the Prefaces of English Learners’ Dictionaries. Foreign Language Education (2): 29-34. |
| [9] | Zhao Yu. 2011. Genre Analysis of Prefaces of Academic Monographs in Linguistics (Unpublished MA Thesis). Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology. |
| [10] | Abdollahzadeh, E. , & Salarvand, H. 2013. Book prefaces in basic, applied and social sciences: a genre-based study. World Applied Sciences Journal 28 (11): 1618-1626. |
| [11] | Mei Meilian. 2001. The Influence of Pragmatic Parameters on Chinese and English Prefaces. Foreign Language Research (3): 17-21. |
| [12] | Mei Meilian. 2002. Contrastive Pragmatic Study on Self-references in Chinese and English Prefaces. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University (3): 27-30. |
| [13] | Yuan,Guorong. 2019. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Study on generic elements of Other-Prefaces in Chinese Monographs. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition) (3): 123-132. |
| [14] | Bhatia, V. K. 2014. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London and New York: Bloomsbury. |
| [15] | Wang Xiaowen. 2006. Genre Colonization of Book Advertising over Book Prefaces -- A Generic Intextuality Perspective (Unpublished MA Thesis). Guangzhou: Guangdong: University of Foreign Studies. |
| [16] | Wang Xiaowen & Li Ming. 2009. Genre Colonization of Book Advertising over Books Prefaces –A diachronic Perspective. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching (5): 22-27. |
| [17] | Wang Xiaowen, Ling Ming, & Lu Hongmei. 2014. Corpus-assisted Perspective on Genre Colonization –Supplement and expansion of Bhatia’s Multi-perspective Model on Generic variation. Journal of Foreign Languages (1): 43-39. |
| [18] | Ji Weining & Xin Bin. 2016. Genre and Social Changes: The Diachronic Study of Textbook Preface Genre. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching (1): 12-18. |
| [19] | Qin Dihui. 2000. General Pattern and its Linguistic features of Prefaces of Anglo-American Science Books. Journal of Xidian University (Social Sciences Edition) (2): 90-95. |
| [20] | Alireza, J., & Zeinab, G. M. 2016. Genre Analysis and Genre-Mixing Across Various Realizations of Academic Book Introductions in Applied Linguistics. The Journal of teaching Language Skills (1): 111-138. |
| [21] | Cai Hongnv. 2007. A Genre Analysis of Chinese and English Prefaces in Economic Books (Unpublished MA Thesis). Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. |
| [22] | Hoda, M. 2013. Rhetorical Move Structure of Literature Book Prefaces in English and Persian. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences (4): 317-323. |
| [23] | Wang Shuhui. 2015. A Contrastive Study on Genre of Chinese and English Self-Made Prefaces in Linguistic Monographs (Unpublished MA Thesis). Handan: Hebei University. |
| [24] | Lu Yun. 2020. A Contrastive Study of Other-made Prefaces to Chinese and English Linguistic Works from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory (Unpublished MA Thesis). Yangzhou: Yangzhou University. |
| [25] | Bhatia, V. K. Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model. IBÉRICA 2002 (4): 3-19. |
| [26] | Martin, J. R. 2004/1992. English Text: System and Structure. Beijing: Peking University Press. |
| [27] | Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. 1989. Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. London: Oxford University Press. |
| [28] | Eggins, S.2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd edn). New York & London: Continuum. |
| [29] | Martin, J. R & Rose, D. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London & Oakville: Equinox. |
| [30] | Jiang Yajun & Zhao Gang. 2006. Linguistic Approaches to Academic Discourse: Division and Integration. Foreign Language Research (6): 1-5, 80. |
| [31] | Halliday, M. A. K. 2000/1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. |
| [32] | Halliday, M. A. K. 2008/2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. |
| [33] | Thompson, G. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London and New York: Routledge. |
| [34] | Simpson, P. 2004. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. |
| [35] | Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman. |
| [36] | Huang Ping. 2008. Genre Analysis of Article Abstracts Written in English in International and Chinese TESOL Journals and Its Use. Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing Corporation• Sichuan People’s Publishing House. |
| [37] | Martinez, I. A. 2001. Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes (20): 227-247. |
| [38] | Behnam, B & Zamanian, J. 2013.Genre Analysis of Oxford and Tabriz Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts: From Move Structure to Transitivity Analysis. The Journal of Applied Linguistics (12): 41-59. |
| [39] | Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us