1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Vocational and Technical University of Mechatronics, Chongqing 402760, China
2. Academy of International and Regional Studies, Sichuan International Study University, Chongqing 400031, China
| Abstract: | Since the reform and opening-up, China relied on its abundant resource endowment and advantages in cheap labor to deeply participate in the global production division led by developed countries, promoting the rapid expansion of the equipment manufacturing industry. However, participating in global production division of labor in this way has locked China's equipment manufacturing industry in the low-end link of the global value chain. How to break through the low-end lock in the value chain and accelerate the transition to the mid and high end is a key issue that urgently needs to be addressed for China's equipment manufacturing industry to achieve high-quality development. Against the backdrop of unprecedented changes in a century, China put forward a new development pattern of "domestic circulation as the mainstay, and domestic and international dual circulation promoting each other" based on the situation. By stimulating domestic demand, new impetus has been injected into promoting high-quality development of the Chinese economy. Based on this, this paper investigates how domestic circulation influences value chain upgrading in the equipment manufacturing industry. From a value-added decomposition perspective, the study constructs indicators to measure domestic circulation, domestic and international value chains, and overall value chain status. Using inter-provincial input-output data, the empirical analysis finds that domestic circulation significantly enhances domestic value chain upgrading but hinders the upgrading of international and overall value chains. Robustness checks, including variable substitutions and instrumental variable methods, confirm the reliability of these findings. The results suggest that to achieve comprehensive value chain upgrading, enterprises should strengthen their domestic advantages while integrating into global networks. Policymakers should prioritize innovation, balance domestic and international development, and ensure smooth international circulation. This study offers theoretical insights and practical policy implications for enhancing China’s equipment manufacturing value chain. |
| Keywords: | Dual Circulation; Domestic Circulation; Equipment Manufacturing Industry; Value Chain Upgrading |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjeb.2025.02.003 |
| 1. | 重庆市教育委员会科技项目: 数字技术赋能重庆装备制造业价值链升级路径研究 (KJQN202303701) |
| 2. | 重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学项目: 数字经济赋能重庆装备制造业转型升级路径研究 (23SKGH209) |
| 3. | 重庆财经职业学院科研项目: “双碳”目标下绿色金融赋能重庆制造业绿色低碳转型的机制与路径研究 (2025KYZ017) |
| [1] | ZHANG L, LIU X, ZHAO S. Financing constraints and technological capability building in China's high-end equipment manufacturing sector [J]. China Economic Review, 2023, 78: 101936. |
| [2] | 王英, 刘婷. 中国对外直接投资驱动装备制造业全球价值链低碳升级的路径研究 [J]. 国际商务 (对外经济贸易大学学报), 2022, (01): 103-118. |
| [3] | 蒲阿丽, 邹松歧. 技术创新对装备制造业国际竞争力的影响——以山东省为例 [J]. 人民论坛学术前沿, 2018, (13): 88-91. |
| [4] | DE MARCHI V. Environmental innovations and internationalization: theory and practice [J]. Ecological Economics, 2022, 196: 107395. |
| [5] | 潘秋晨. 全球价值链嵌入对中国装备制造业转型升级的影响研究 [J]. 世界经济研究, 2019, (09): 78-96+135-136. |
| [6] | 杨玲, 汪国栋. 生产性服务投入对我国高端装备制造业出口质量的影响研究 [J]. 宏观质量研究, 2025, 13(01): 57-70. |
| [7] | 胡丽娜, 薛阳. 政府补助对装备制造业转型升级的激励效应 [J]. 当代经济研究, 2022, (08): 88-99. |
| [8] | 潘欣欣. 双循环新发展格局对产业链韧性的影响研究——基于复杂系统的产业链韧性测度法 [J]. 暨南学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2025, 47(07): 75-98. |
| [9] | 刘勇, 李丽珍. “双循环”新发展格局下企业转型发展的机理、路径与政策建议 [J]. 河北经贸大学学报, 2021, 42(01): 41-50. |
| [10] | 张建华, 赵英, 刘慧玲. 国内国际双循环视角下中国产业结构转型升级研究 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (09): 42-60. |
| [11] | 周中胜, 李卓, 周胡迪. “双循环”新发展格局下制造业企业转型升级的理论逻辑、战略方向与实现路径 [J]. 苏州大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(01): 38-48. |
| [12] | ZONG Y, HE M. The Impact Imposed by Brand Elements of Enterprises on the Purchase Intention of Consumers-With Experience Value Taken as the Intermediary Variable [J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 873041. |
| [13] | LIU D, ZHU X, YU H. Economic policy uncertainty, intra-industry trade, and China's mechanical and electrical product exports [J]. PLOS One, 2024, 19(1): e0290866. |
| [14] | XU H, YANG F, ZHENG W. The effectiveness of government incentives for outward investment: The case of China's Belt and Road Initiative [J]. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2024, 42(3): 512-530. |
| [15] | LIU S, CHEN B, WANG Y. How does the dual-circulation strategy drive China’s industrial upgrading? Evidence from manufacturing value chains [J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2023, 86: 101618. |
| [16] | WANG Z, WEI S J, ZHU K. Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector level [R]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013. |
| [17] | KOOPMAN R, WANG Z, WEI S J. Tracing Value-added and Double Counting in Gross Exports [J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(2): 459-494. |
| [18] | XUE J J, ZHANG S. High-speed rail, market access, and domestic market integration: Evidence from China [J]. China Economic Review, 2023, 77: 101928. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us