上海市徐汇区行政学院, 上海 200030
| 摘 要: | 基础教育减负不仅是中央教育改革的重点也是国民最为关切的问题之一,其中课后服务的质量更是学界关注的焦点。基于一项“双减”政策背景下课后服务情况的调查,运用描述性分析、回归分析等统计方法,分析S市家长课后服务满意度及其影响因素。得出主要结论如下:家长对学校提供的课后服务整体满意度比较高,说明“双减”政策在提高课后服务水平方面成效显著;影响其课后服务满意度的因素主要有孩子的作业量、孩子睡眠时间、综合能力提升以及家长对“双减”政策的了解程度等。对此,提出一方面仍需强化学校履行课后服务的主体责任;另一方面持续推动精细化施策,进一步提升学生和家长的满意度和获得感等政策建议。 |
| 关 键 词: | “双减”政策; 课后服务满意度; 影响因素 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.edu.2026.03.001 |
Shanghai Xuhui District Administration Institute, Shanghai 200030, China
| Abstract: | Reducing the burden of compulsory education is not only a key focus of the central government's education reform but also one of the most pressing public concerns, so there are lots of studies on the quality of after-school services. Based on a survey concerning after-school services under the "Double Reduction" policy, this study employs statistical methods, including descriptive and regression analyses, to examine parental satisfaction with these services and its influencing factors. The main conclusions are as follows: parents exhibit a relatively high level of overall satisfaction with the after-school services provided by schools, indicating the significant effectiveness of the "Double Reduction" policy in enhancing the quality of these services. The primary factors influencing parental satisfaction include the volume of children's homework, their sleep duration, the enhancement of their comprehensive abilities, and the parents' level of understanding of the "Double Reduction" policy. In light of these findings, this paper proposes policy recommendations. On one hand, it is necessary to further strengthen the primary responsibility of schools in delivering after-school services. On the other hand, it is crucial to continue promoting refined and targeted policy implementation to further improve the satisfaction and sense of gain for both students and parents. |
| Keywords: | Double Reduction Policy; After-School Service Satisfaction; Influencing Factors |
| 1. | 上海市哲学社会科学青年项目“上海市义务教育优质均衡发展的政策实践及其对学生教育获得影响研究” (2023ESH004) |
| [1] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》, http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202107/t20210724_546576.html |
| [2] | 吴开俊, 孟卫青. 治理视角下小学生课后托管的制度设计 [J]. 教育研究, 2015, 36(06): 55-63. |
| [3] | 杨启光, 朱纯洁. 论我国儿童课后照顾与教育服务的需求及政府责任 [J]. 教育理论与实践, 2014(34): 25-29. |
| [4] | 康丽颖, 贾丽. 中美儿童托管教育的比较分析 [J]. 比较教育研究, 2011(12): 20-23. |
| [5] | 王彦丽, 吕君. 韩国小学课后托管政策及其启示——以“放课后学校为例” [J]. 当代教育科学, 2018(09): 23-26+55. |
| [6] | 唐科莉. 欧洲国家“课后托管服务”面面观 [J]. 基础教育参考, 2014(021): 71-75. |
| [7] | 李智. 日本儿童课后照顾服务制度及其启示 [J]. 中南大学学报 (社会科学版), 2016(02): 213-219. |
| [8] | 李会芹,曾巧.“双减”政策实施四周年的成效、困境与破解之道——基于H区的实证调研[J].教育科学论坛, 2026,(02): 76-80. |
| [9] | 顾艳丽, 罗生全. 中小学课后服务政策的价值分析 [J]. 教育科学研究, 2018(09): 34-38. |
| [10] | 龚欣, 肖婕, 高巍, 等. “双减”三周年成效检视与优化路径研究——基于七省十九地市的实证调查 [J]. 教育发展研究, 2025, 45(Z2): 97-106. |
| [11] | 宁本涛, 杨柳. 中小学生“作业减负”政策实施成效及协同机制分析——基于全国30个省 (市、区) 137个地级市的调查 [J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(01): 9-16+23. |
| [12] | 黄冲, 王志伟, 姚奕鹏等. “双减”实施后72. 7%受访家长表示教育焦虑有所缓解 [N]. 中国青年报, 2021-09-16(010). https://doi.org/10.38302/n.cnki.nzgqn.2021.003505 |
| [13] | 都晓. “双减”背景下的课后服务研究述论 [J]. 新疆师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版) 2022(04): 50-61. |
| [14] | 罗生全, 张玉. “双减”与“双提”: 教学变革的逻辑转换与理念重构 [J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022(02): 3-10+20. |
| [15] | 徐细雄, 占恒, 李万利. 党组织嵌入、政策感知与民营企业新增投资 [J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020(10): 3-16. |
| [16] | 罗枭, 侯浩翔. 义务教育阶段教师对“双减”的政策感知分析与改进建议 [J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(03): 22-29. |
| [17] | 唐延昕, 赵永辉. 中小学课后服务家长满意度及影响因素分析——基于X省8个县 (区) 的调查 [J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2023(02): 73-80. |