天然气井筒用药剂研究进展与发展趋势
1. 西安长庆化工集团有限公司, 陕西西安 710200
2. 中国石化上海高桥石油化工有限公司, 陕西西安 200137
3. 西安石油大学油气田化学陕西省高校工程研究中心, 陕西西安 710065
| 摘 要： | 目前，天然气的开采常伴随井底积液、井筒腐蚀和水合物堵塞等问题，传统上针对这几个问题的解决方法是分别使用单一化学剂。当气井井筒存在井底积液时，选用泡排剂实施气井泡沫排液；为避免气井井筒出现腐蚀，则选择注入缓蚀剂以保护井筒；当井筒存在水合物堵塞风险时，则选择注入水合物防聚剂等化学剂。然而，现实中以上问题往往同时存在，若依次单独加入上述三种化学剂则容易出现不配伍等问题。若研发出一种泡排-防聚-缓蚀多种功能一体剂体系，则能同时解决上述三种问题，实现一剂多效。目前，能同时解决上述三个问题的多功能一体剂的研究报道较少。本文结合泡排剂、缓蚀剂、水合物防聚剂的作用机理及发展现状，提出一种同时具有泡排、缓蚀和抑制水合物聚集的多功能一体剂，为促进天然气稳产增产提供新策略。 |
| 关 键 词： | 泡排; 缓蚀; 水合物防聚; 一体剂 |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.mater.2024.01.001 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2023-12-13
接受日期: 2024-02-01
在线出版日期: 2024-02-04
Research Progress and Development Trend of Chemicals Used for Natural Gas Wells
1. Xi’an Changqing Chemical Group Co. Ltd, Xi’an 710200, China
2. Sinopec Gaoqiao Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200137, China
3. Xi'an Petroleum University Oil and Gas Field Chemistry Shaanxi Provincial University Engineering Research Center, Xi’an 710065, China
| Abstract: | At present, the production of natural gas is often accompanied by problems such as liquid accumulation at the bottom of the well, wellbore corrosion, and hydrate plugging. The traditional solution to these problems is to use a single chemical agent. Usually, foaming agents, corrosion inhibitors and hydrate anti-agglomerants are injected into the wells to mitigate the liquid loading, corrosion and blockage caused by gas hydrate, respectively. However, the issues associated with liquid loading, corrosion and blocakeges by hydrate often occurs at the same time, there may be compatibility issues among the foaming agents, corrosion inhibitors and hydrate anti-agglomerants. If multi-functional integrated agents are developed, those three problems mentioned above can simultaneously be solved. However, there are few reports regarding the multi-functional integrated agents that can simultaneously solve the above three problems. This article combines the action mechanism and development status of foaming agents for gas well deliquification, corrosion inhibitors and hydrate anti-agglomerants to propose a multi-functional integrated agent that simultaneously has liquid unloading, corrosion inhibition and hydrate anti-agglomeration, providing a new idea to efficiently promote the natural gas production. |
| Keywords: | Foam-based Deliquification; Corrosion Inhibition; Hydrate Anti-aggregation; Integrated Agent |
参考文献
| [1] | Zhang T, Wang S Z, Dong C H. Experimental study on the emergency disposal agent for methanol leakage [C]. Advanced Materials Research, 2017, 1142: 306–313. |
| [2] | Zhang H R, Liang Y T, Zhou X Y, et al. Sensitivity analysis and optimal operation control for large-scale waterflooding pipeline network of oilfield [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 154: 38–48. |
| [3] | Pan F, Zhang Z, Zhang X, et al. Impact of anionic and cationic surfactants interfacial tension on the oil recovery enhancement [J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 373: 93-98. |
| [4] | 邹啁. 产水凝析气井井筒积液分析 [D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2014. |
| [5] | 刘庭崧, 刘妮. 醇类抑制剂对甲烷水合物形成的影响 [J]. 原子与分子物理学报, 2021, 39(1): 7-11. |
| [6] | 杨芳. 甲醇对两种低温复合型泡排剂性能的影响 [J]. 黑龙江科技信息, 2013(24): 104-105. |
| [7] | 李勇, 杨肖曦, 赵磊, 等. 现河注水井井筒腐蚀及其机理研究 [J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2007, 19(1): 66-68. |
| [8] | Tan G, Yang Z. Analysis of corrosion factors of wellbore and gathering pipelines in zhalaruoer condensate gas field in kazakstan [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001, 2(1): 1-8. |
| [9] | Brycki B, Szulc A. Gemini surfactants as corrosion inhibitors. A review [J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021: 334. |
| [10] | 韩长武. 天然气井排水采气工艺方法优选 [D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2012. |
| [11] | 周侗. 低压气井耐温抗盐抗油泡排剂研究 [D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2020. |
| [12] | Arnaudov L, Denkov N D, Surcheva I, et al. Effect of oily additives on foamability and foam stability [J]. Langmuir, 2001, 17(22): 6999-7010. |
| [13] | Dippenaar A. The destabilization of froth by solids I: The mechanism of film rupture [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1982, 9(1): 1-14. |
| [14] | 聂淑兰. 无聚合物压裂液使死井复活 [J]. 国外油田工程, 2000, 16(6): 19-22. |
| [15] | 杨冠科, 王成. 一种阳离子表面活性剂类清洁压裂液配方设计与性能评价 [C]. 中国采油工程技术及油田化学技术交流会. 2011. |
| [16] | Bureiko A, Trybala A, Huang J, et al. Bulk and surface rheology of Aculyn™ 22 and Aculyn™ 33 polymeric solutions and kinetics of foam drainage [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 434: 268-275. |
| [17] | 饶喜丽. 极端环境下泡排剂的研制及其排水工艺研究 [D]. 武汉: 长江大学, 2013. |
| [18] | 尹忠. 泡排剂CZP的泡沫性能研究 [J]. 天然气工业, 1995, 15(2): 56-59. |
| [19] | 郭学辉, 刘生福, 王咏梅, 等. 泡排剂NJS在中原油田的应用 [J]. 化工时刊, 2001, 15(4): 30-33. |
| [20] | 马成华. 一种高温泡排剂的实验室评价 [J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2007, 8(12): 37-39. |
| [21] | 刘竟成, 杨敏, 袁福锋. 新型气井泡排剂SP的起泡性能研究 [J]. 油田化学, 2008, 25(2): 111-114. |
| [22] | 冯朋鑫, 陆利平, 韩勇, 等. ERD-05g新型泡排剂在苏48区块试验效果分析 [J]. 石油化工应用, 2010, 29(6): 28-31. |
| [23] | 李谦定, 卢永斌, 李善建, 等. 新型高效泡排剂LYB-1的研制及其性能评价 [J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(6): 49-52+126. |
| [24] | 胡敏, 刘祥, 薛丹, 等. 一种新型抗盐耐油型泡排剂的研制 [J]. 广东化工, 2015, 42(9): 10-13. |
| [25] | 李进, 徐杰, 王明凤, 等. 气井泡排剂SCF-1的室内研究 [J]. 当代化工, 2016, 45(10): 2292-2295. |
| [26] | 武俊文, 张汝生, 贾文峰, 等. 基于Gemini表面活性剂及纳米材料的高效泡排剂 [J].化学研究与应用, 2018, 30(2): 263-269. |
| [27] | Abdel-Gaber A M, Rahal H T, Beqai F T. Eucalyptus leaf extract as a eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in sulfuric and phosphoric acid solutions [J]. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 2020, 11(2): 123-132. |
| [28] | Villamizar W, Casales M, Gonzales-Rodriguez J G, et al. An EIS study of the effect of the pedant group in imidazolines as corrosion inhibitors for carbon steel in CO2 environments [J]. Materials and Corrosion, 2006, 57(9): 696-704. |
| [29] | Asmara Y P, Suraj V, Siregar J P, et al. Development of green vapour corrosion inhibitorr [J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 257(1): 012089. |
| [30] | tuen E, James A, Akaranta O, et al. Eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor from Pennisetum purpureum biomass and synergistic intensifiers for mild steel [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 24(10): 1442-1447. |
| [31] | Garrido R A S, Vazquez A E, Campechano-Lira C, et al. Evaluation of a Non-Ionic Gemini Surfactant as Sweet Corrosion Inhibitor for X100 Steel in Sweet Brine Solution [J]. ECS Transactions, 2023, 110(1): 141. |
| [32] | 郑家燊, 张琼玖, 丁诗健, 等. “7701”酸化缓酸剂的研究 [J]. 华中工学院学报, 1982(1): 47-56. |
| [33] | 王佳, 曹楚南, 陈家坚. 缓蚀剂理论与研究方法的进展 [J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 1992, 4(2): 79-86. |
| [34] | 郑兴文. 从竹叶中提取硫酸酸洗缓蚀剂的研究 [D]. 四川理工学院, 2009. |
| [35] | 邵明鲁, 刘德新, 朱彤宇, 等. 乌洛托品季铵盐缓蚀剂的合成与复配研究 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2020, 40(3): 244-250. |
| [36] | Kelland M A. History of the development of low dosage hydrate inhibitors [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(3): 825-847. |
| [37] | Zhong Y, Rogers R E. Surfactant effects on gas hydrate formation [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(19): 4175-4187. |
| [38] | Bybee K. Antiagglomerant Hydrate Inhibitors Prevent Hydrate Plugs in Deepwater Systems [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2000, 52(10): 23-24. |
| [39] | Sun M, Firoozabadi A. New surfactant for hydrate anti-agglomeration in hydrocarbon flowlines and seabed oil capture [J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2013, 402: 312-319. |
| [40] | 全红平, 李强, 陈唐东, 等. 一种动力学天然气水合物抑制剂合成研究 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013, 13(14): 3986-3989. |
| [41] | 闫柯乐, 孙长宇, 邹兵, 等. 动力学抑制剂与水合物阻聚剂联用时抑制性能研究 [J]. 现代化工, 2015, 35(6): 95-98. |
| [42] | 徐勇军, 曾亚龙, 杨晓西, 等. 盐对气体水合物防聚剂作用的影响 [J]. 精细化工中间体, 2008, 38(1): 62-65. |
| [43] | 闫柯乐, 孙长宇, 姜素霞, 等. 复配型水合物防聚剂性能评价实验研究 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(31): 23-29. |
| [44] | 蒋善良, 陈超, 利观宝, 等. 盐含量对天然气水合物防聚剂性能的影响 [J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8): 120-125. |
| [45] | 董三宝, 田茂琳, 徐遥远, 等. 天然气水合物防聚剂研究进展 [J]. 广东化工, 2021, 48(10): 82-85. |
| [46] | 李农, 刘承华, 艾天敬, 等. 泡排剂的阻垢防垢性研究 [J]. 天然气工业, 2005(S1): 89-91+3. |
| [47] | 李伟, 蒋泽银, 艾天敬, 等. 抗温抗盐复合缓蚀起泡剂的室内评价及应用 [J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2015, 44(1): 59-62. |
