近15年Discourse Studies研究热点分析
中南林业科技大学, 外国语学院, 湖南长沙 410004
| 摘 要： | 以期刊Discourse Studies在2010年1月至2025年7月期间所刊发的文献为研究对象，利用科学计量分析软件Citespace，从发文量、高被引文献、高被引作者、研究热点和前沿等方向对近15年Discourse Studies研究的整体发展脉络进行系统分析，研究发现：(1) 美国在期刊Discourse Studies中一直占领重要地位，而中国在Discourse Studies方面的研究虽然影响力大增，但还未成为“中介”，与其他国家合作交流有待进一步深化。(2) 社会互动中的认知建构与行为形成、数字平台与社交媒体中话语产生的分析、话语应用场景分析、话语分析方法跨学科融合是Discourse Studies近15年的研究热点。本文认为，近15年Discourse Studies的发展呈现出从“理论探索”向“理论-实践融合”深化，注重理论建构与实证研究的结合，尤其是话语应用场景分析与跨学科方法融合。 |
| 关 键 词： | 话语研究; 话语应用场景; 计量分析; 热点研究 |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2026.02.002 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2026-03-04
接受日期: 2026-03-20
在线出版日期: 2026-03-24
Mapping Research Hotspots in Discourse Studies (2010–2025)
School of Foreign Languages, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
| Abstract: | This study takes research articles published in the journal Discourse Studies between January 2010 and July 2025 as its research object. Using the scientometric analysis software CiteSpace, it systematically analyzes the overall development trajectory of Discourse Studies over the past 15 years from the perspectives of publication volume, highly cited documents, highly cited authors, research hotspots, and frontiers. The findings reveal that: (1) The United States has consistently held a dominant position in the journal Discourse Studies. Although China's influence in this field has grown significantly, it has not yet become a "central intermediary" in the global collaboration network, and its cooperative exchanges with other countries need further deepening. (2) The research hotspots in Discourse Studies over the past 15 years include: cognitive construction and action formation in social interaction; analysis of discourse production on digital platforms and social media; analysis of discourse application contexts; and the interdisciplinary integration of discourse analysis methods. This paper argues that the development of Discourse Studies in the past 15 years exhibits a deepening shift from "theoretical exploration" towards "theory-practice integration," emphasizing the combination of theoretical construction and empirical research, particularly the integration of discourse application context analysis with interdisciplinary methods. |
| Keywords: | Discourse Studies; Discourse Application Contexts; Scientometric Analysis; Research Hotspots |
基金
| 1. | 2023年湖南省社科基金教育学专项课题“高校英语教师数字化教学能力测度评估、影响因素及提升策略研究” (编号: 23YBJ17) |
参考文献
| [1] | Antaki C. Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings [J]. Discourse Studies, 2012, 14(2): 131-149. |
| [2] | Asmuss B, Oshima S. Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences [J]. Discourse Studies, 2012, 14(1): 67-86. |
| [3] | Atkins S. Corpus. Linguistics and conversation analysis in general practice simulation: Identifying key interactional features for educational assessment [J]. Medical Education, 2019, 53(10): 1072-1082. |
| [4] | Bolden GB. 'Articulating the unsaid' via and-prefaced formulations of others' talk [J]. Discourse Studies, 2010, 12(2): 167–184. |
| [5] | Brookes G, McEnery T. The utility of topic modelling for Discourse Studies: A critical evaluation [J]. Discourse Studies, 2019, 21(1): 3–21. |
| [6] | Clift R, Raymond C W. Actions in practice: On details in collections [J]. Discourse Studies, 2018, 20(1): 90-119. |
| [7] | Craven A, Potter J. Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action [J]. Discourse Studies, 2010, 12(1): 69–92. |
| [8] | De Fina A, King KA. Language problem or language conflict? Narratives of immigrant women's experiences in the US [J]. Discourse Studies, 2011, 13(2): 143–162. |
| [9] | Drew P. Epistemics in social interaction [J]. Discourse Studies, 2018, 20(1): 1–11. |
| [10] | Edwards D. Some uses of subject-side assessments [J]. Discourse Studies, 2017, 19(4): 411–430. |
| [11] | Fairclough N. Language and Power [M]. London: Longman, 1989. |
| [12] | Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge [M]. London: Routledge, 1972. |
| [13] | Ford J, Hepburn A, Parry R. What do displays of empathy do in palliative care consultations? [J]. Discourse Studies, 2019, 21(1): 3-24. |
| [14] | Golato A. Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso. and ach in German interaction [J]. Discourse Studies, 2010, 12(5): 553–573. |
| [15] | Heritage J. Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds [J]. Discourse Studies, 2013, 15(2): 171–187. |
| [16] | Jiang F, Hyland K. The fact that': Stance nouns in disciplinary writing [J]. Discourse Studies, 2015, 17(5): 531–548. |
| [17] | Kent A. Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives [J]. Discourse Studies, 2012, 14(3): 299–319. |
| [18] | Mondada L. Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits [J]. Discourse Studies, 2013, 15(5): 523–544. |
| [19] | Mondada L. Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant's hands [J]. Discourse Studies, 2014, 16(4): 414–436. |
| [20] | Mondada L. The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops [J]. Discourse Studies, 2018, 20(1): 3–23. |
| [21] | Smithson J. Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm [J]. Discourse Studies, 2011, 13(2): 163–182. |
| [22] | Stokoe E. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis [J]. Discourse Studies, 2012, 14(1): 27–44. |
| [23] | Stommel W, Koole T. The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member [J]. Discourse Studies, 2010, 12(1): 93–110. |
| [24] | Stevanovic M. Establishing joint decisions in a dyad [J]. Discourse Studies, 2012, 14(3): 321–340. |
| [25] | Wu X P, Fitzgerald R. ‘Hidden in plain sight’: Expressing political criticism on Chinese social media [J]. Discourse Studies, 2021, 23(3): 365-385. |
| [26] | Zemel A. 'Put your fingers right in here': Learnability and instructed experience [J]. Discourse Studies, 2014, 16(2): 131–149. |
| [27] | Zhang LT, Cassany D. Making sense of danmu: Coherence in massive anonymous chats on Bilibili.com [J]. Discourse Studies, 2020, 22(2): 187–204. |
| [28] | Zou H, Hyland K. Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs [J]. Discourse Studies, 2019, 21(4): 434–450. |
| [29] | 郇昌鹏. 话语分析领域图景勾勒 (1978-2018): 一项文献计量研究 [J]. Discourse Studies, 2020, 22(4): 461-480. |
| [30] | 李战子, 韩泽婷. 人工智能时代的多模态话语研究: 机遇与路径 [J]. 当代外语研究, 2025, 25(3): 119-128. |
| [31] | 刘璇. 2023年中国批评话语分析研究综述 [J]. 话语研究论丛, 2024(1): 140-158. |
| [32] | 李杰, 陈超美. CiteSpace: 科技文本挖掘及可视化 [M]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学出版社, 2016. |
| [33] | 张德禄. 多模态话语建构中的模态融合模式研究 [J]. 现代外语, 2023, 46(4): 439-451. |
| [34] | 庄漫琳. 中国话语分析视角下中国国家形象研究进展与热点分析 [J]. 语言与文化研究, 2025, 33(1): 69-72. |
