Study of GRACE and TIMI Risk Scores’ Application in the Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in Qinghai
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Emergency Center of Qinghai People’s Hospital, Xining 810007, China
2. Electrophysiology Department, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining 810000, China
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare the risk stratification ability and prognostic evaluation values of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in Qinghai. Methods: The clinical data of 385 patients with ACS treated at our hospital from January 2021 to October 2022 were analyzed to calculate the Grace and TIMI risk scores of each patient. The main adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days of onset and 1 year after discharge were followed up. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the two scoring systems were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the risk stratification in patients with ACS according to GRACE and TIMI scores (χ2=0.316, P=0.854). The scores of both grading systems showed a tendency to increase with increasing risk stratification (P<0.001). In addition, the higher the GRACE and TIMI risk scores, the higher the incidence rate of MACE in patients within 30 days of the onset and 1 year after discharge (P<0.01). Taking 143 points of the GRACE risk score as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting MACE within 1 year after discharge were 89.93% and 90.83%, respectively. The AUC value under the ROC curve was 0.775. However, if 3.8 points of TIMI risk score was taken as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting MACE within 1 year after discharge were changed to 81.15% and 89.27%, respectively, while the AUC value was 0.743. The difference between the AUC values calculated using the two risk scores was statistically significant. (Z=5.436, P<0.01). Conclusion: GRACE and TIMI risk scores can be used for risk stratification of patients with ACS in Qinghai. The GRACE risk score had a higher predictive value for recent adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. |
| Keywords: | Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Risk Score; The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score; Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS); Risk Stratification; Prognosis; Adverse Cardiovascular Events |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjcm.2024.01.002 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2024-03-25
接受日期: 2024-05-11
在线出版日期: 2024-05-23
基金
| 1. | Grant Ruiyi Fund from the Foundation of Peking union Medical (No. 2014019) |
参考文献
| [1] | HU S T, ANG Z W, Overview of China cardiovascular health and disease report 2022 [J]. hin J Cardiovasc Res, 2023, 21(7): 577-600. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5301.2023.07.001 |
| [2] | MITSIS A, GRAGNANO F. Myocardial Infarction with and without ST-segment Elevation: a Contemporary Reappraisal of Similarities and Differences [J]. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2021, 17(4): e230421189013. https://doi.org/ARTNe23042118901310.2174/1573403X16999201210195702 |
| [3] | LYU X, HUANG J L, JIN Q, et al. Analysis of prognostic risk factors in patients with acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and establishment and verification of predictive nomogram [J]. J Clin Cardiol, 2022, 38(12): 967-974. https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2022.12.008 |
| [4] | YAO Y, SHAO C, LI X, et al. A novel biomarker scoring systemalone or in combination with the grace score for the prognostic assessment in non-st-elevation myocardial infarction [J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2022, 14: 911-923. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S370004 |
| [5] | KUMAR D, SAGHIR T, ZAHID M, et al. Validity of TIMI score for predicting 14-Day mortality of non ST elevation myocardial infarctionpatients [J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(1): e12518. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12518 |
| [6] | Ferreira JA, Baptista RM, Monteiro SR, et al. Admission hyperglycemia and all-cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: a tertiary center analysis [J]. Intern Emerg Med, 2021, 16(8): 2109-2119. |
| [7] | Upur H, Li JL, Zou XG, et al. Short and long-term prognosis of admission hyperglycemia in patients with and without diabetes after acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2022, 21(1): 114. |
| [8] | Schmitz T, Freuer D, Harmel E, et al. Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio on short-and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction [J]. Acta Diabetol, 2022, 59(8): 1019-1029. |
| [9] | Sia CH, Chan MH, Zheng H, et al. Optimal glucose, HbA1c, glucose-HbA1c ratio and stress-hyperglycaemia ratio cut-off values for predicting 1-year mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic acute myocardial infarction patients [J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2021, 20(1): 211. |
| [10] | Cullen L, Greenslade J, Hammett CJ, et al. Comparison of there risk stratification rules for predicting patients with acute coronary syndrome presenting to an Australian Emergence Department [J]. Heart Lung Circu, 2013, 10(2): 33-38. |
| [11] | Wang H. Prognostic value of GRACE and TIMI score in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Qinghai area [D]. Suzhou: Suzhou University, 2015: 13-14. |
| [12] | Tang EW, Wong CK, Herbison P. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome [J]. Am Heart J, 2019, 153(1): 29-35. |
| [13] | Stracke S, Dorr O, Heidt MC, et al. GRACE risk score as predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with chest pain [J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2018, 99(10): 627-631. |
| [14] | Koonsiripaiboon E, Tungsubutra W. Validation of the GRACE risk score to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Thailand [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2019, 96(2): 139-145. |
| [15] | Damman P, Woudstra P, Kuijt WJ, et al. Shoart-and long-term prognostic value of the TIMI risk score after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2013, 26(1): 8-13. |
| [16] | Wu TY, Luo Y. Prognostic value of GRACE, TIMI and PURSUIT risk score in patients with acute coronary syndrome during hospitalization [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2014, 30(5): 786-788. |
| [17] | Hess EP. Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a Meta-analysis [J]. CMAJ. 2020, 182(10): 1039-1044. |
| [18] | Paiva LV, Providencia RC, Barra SN, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment of pulmonary embolism with the GRACE risk score [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 111(3): 425-431. |
| [19] | Muhammed Abdul Rheem, Abdulaziz Abdulaziz Bahnacy, Ali Ahmed Ali, et al. Predictive Value of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.[J]. Archives of Medical Research, 41(2010): 618-622. |
| [20] | XueYan Zhao MD, JianXin Li MD, et al. Prognostic value of the GRACE discharge score for predicting the mortality of patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.[J]. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020, 95(S1): 550-557. |
