1. 广东工业大学, 管理学院, 广东广州 510520
2. 深圳市委党校深圳高级经理研修院 (深圳企业家研修院), 广东深圳 518029
3. 广州应用科技学院, 经济与管理学院, 广东肇庆 511370
4. 广州市八方锦程人力资源有限公司, 广东广州 510610
| 摘 要: | 商业化变革和技术化变革均是21世纪政府治理变革和国家治理现代化的重要手段,其中单一的变革研究比较多,但二者协同的变革研究比较少。本文通过马斯克的“百日维新”进行单案例研究,探讨政府的商业化与技术化协同变革对国家治理现代化的赋能机制。研究结果表明:商业化与技术化协同变革的赋能作用是籍助政府治理适应性变革的中间途径来实现的,它提升了国家治理现代化(包括治理理念、治理体系和治理能力现代化)的水平,而技术化变革(从嵌入到匹配)在其中扮演了重要的协同作用。因此,通过市场化改革、制度改革和机构改革进行商业化变革,促进政府治理适应性变革,进而通过技术化变革(从嵌入到匹配)的反复协同耦合,有助于推动国家治理现代化。 |
| 关 键 词: | 商业化变革; 技术化变革; 协同变革; 赋能机制; 国家治理现代化 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjeb.2025.02.001 |
1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
2. Shenzhen Party School, Shenzhen Business Executives Institute (Shenzhen Entrepreneur Institute), Shenzhen 518029, China
3. School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou College of Applied Science and Technology, Zhaoqing 511370, China
4. Guangzhou BafangJincheng Human Resources Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510610, China
| Abstract: | Commercialization transformation and technological transformation serve as critical instruments for driving governmental reform and advancing the modernization of state governance in the 21st century. There are many studies on single transformation of commercialization transformation and technological transformation, but few on the collaborative transformation of the two. This paper employs a single-case study of Elon Reeve Musk’s "Hundred Days' Reform" (a metaphor for rapid innovation cycles) to explore the enabling mechanisms of synergistic commercialization-technological reform in modernizing state governance. The findings reveal that the empowering effect of such synergistic reforms is mediated through adaptive governmental governance. Specifically, this dual reform elevates the modernization of state governance—encompassing the modernization of governance concepts, systems, and capacities—while technological reform (progressing from embedding to matching) plays a pivotal synergistic role. Consequently, advancing commercialization reform through marketization, institutional restructuring, and organizational adjustments fosters adaptive governance. This, in turn, facilitates iterative synergy and coupling with technological reform (from embedding to matching), ultimately propelling the modernization of state governance. |
| Keywords: | Commercialization Reform; Technological Reform; Synergistic Reform; Enabling Mechanism; Modernization of State Governance |
| [1] | 周文彰. 数字政府和国家治理现代化 [J]. 行政管理改革, 2020, (2): 4-10. |
| [2] | 吕同舟. 政府职能转变的理论逻辑与过程逻辑——基于国家治理现代化的思考 [J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017, (5): 54-58+145. |
| [3] | 薛澜, 李宇环. 走向国家治理现代化的政府职能转变: 系统思维与改革取向 [J]. 政治学研究, 2014, (5): 61-70. |
| [4] | 胡宁生. 国家治理现代化: 政府、市场和社会新型协同互动 [J]. 南京社会科学, 2014, (1): 80-86+106. |
| [5] | 赖先进. 国家治理现代化场景下协同治理理论框架的构建 [J]. 党政研究, 2020, (3): 103-110. |
| [6] | Xia Z. The Logical Transformation of the Modernization of State Governance [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2021, 42(2): 4-23. |
| [7] | 何斌, 赵楠, 何琴清, 胡卫敏. 管理模式转型视角的数字化管理适应性变革研究——以字节跳动为例 [J]. 北京交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 2022, 21(2): 29-36. |
| [8] | 丁元竹. 治理现代化呼唤政府治理理论创新 [J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017, (3): 37-42+129. |
| [9] | 马斯哲. 西方政府治理理论对我国政府改革的启示 [J]. 现代经济信息, 2016, (22): 28-29. |
| [10] | 李娜, 曾维和. 从公民参与到公民治理——公众崛起时代西方政府治理理论创新及启示 [J]. 湖北经济学院学报, 2010, 8(3): 69-75. |
| [11] | 史伟锋. 政府治理理论研究综述 [J]. 江西行政学院学报, 2008, 10(S2): 19-21. |
| [12] | 景玉琴, 蔡甦琳. 政府治理理论的新进展及启示 [J]. 山西师大学报 (社会科学版), 2007, (3): 10-13. |
| [13] | 商庆军. 政府治理理论与实践的新发展 [J]. 华东经济管理, 2007, (2): 51-55. |
| [14] | 马斯克百日维新失败, 不体面退场, 应该如何评价? https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1831014706695407989&wfr=spider&for=pc. 2025-05-02. |